EITHER WE SAVE THE ECONOMY OR WE SAVE MAN!

What I wrote on Facebook:

We cannot stop the world, "the remedy is worse than the disease", common sense, for all those who have pressured and criticized the government to declare a national emergency, and that is not possible, the economy would stop, and that is the death of a world based and configured by the capitalist economy, now, let's not stop the economy as much as we can, and in the meantime, let's build a culture of hygiene, prevention and solidarity, and then change the ludic and epicurean economic vision, without world social justice, for a community and human economy, a revision of our vision of man and society ..... the empire itself knows it, the economy cannot be stopped ... if the empire suffers when most we ... our president knows this and has acted wisely!

It deserves some context and debate, clarifications and clarifications, although it is true that part of a Trum declaration, this does not mean an apology, much less an adherence and justification of the neoliberal system, which I have always thought is the worst pandemic it has generated man himself, and that he has left more dead, even human beings die as yet unborn, condemned to poverty and hunger, than all pandemics, armed conflicts and natural catastrophes. And that, on the contrary, is a complaint that I made that this terrible dilemma that the human being lives: either we save the economy or we save man! We would never have had it if you had created a truly democratic economy at the service of man.

An economic system that reflects the Marxist sentence that "social existence determines social consciousness", has created a vision of man and his ends frivolous, blind and poor, current docile and naive societies, share portions of wish fulfillment with repression, fictitious loves with suffering, human life is resolved in a heartbreaking scream before a goal, a shot, a batting, a withering blow to the adversary, orgasms of a second, where the meaning of life is deposited, although the greatest of time, we wake up dazed wanting to have never awakened to continue living the true enjoyment of completeness, death, and then we drag our bodies through monothematic baths, endless stairs and elevators, repeated dialogues to satiety, and deposit our body in a place we have never loved , and our souls continue losses in paradisiacal storm clouds that hardly sustain them.

In this declaration, Trum defends the choice of the economy at the cost of human lives and suffering, he does not stop insisting on defending at all costs a tricky public ethic built ad hoc of the need to build subjects that reproduce and sustain the dominant economic system. , social inequality, and preserving the perverse dialectic that never ends in a synthesis, poor-rich, the dissolution of the struggle of opposites is a necessary and vital impossible to sustain the vision of what is "just", no Antigone has a place in that neoliberal system.

Verbatim, he declares: "You can destroy a country if you turn it off", "we lose thousands of people every year to the flu and we have never closed the country. We lose a lot more people in car accidents and we don't ban them. We can distance ourselves socially, we can stop shaking hands for a while. People will die. But we will lose more people if we plunge the country into a huge recession or depression. Thousands of suicides, instability. You cannot close the United States, the most successful country. People can go back to work and practice good judgment, "" No one has asked me if, as an older person, I would be willing to risk my survival to maintain the United States that we love for my grandchildren and great-grandchildren. If that's the deal, I accept it, "" You can't stop the economy forever. " "Should we start thinking about whether everyone should be out of work?

He even pretends to be a martyr of the system, if he has to give his life for the future of the new generations, “he will do it!”, What he does not say, is that he is willing to sacrifice to preserve this unjust system for the minority elite that He rules this world, and that his statement reveals his concern that this coronavirus health crisis will drag the Yankee dominance and dominance of the world: "You cannot close the United States, the most successful country", the money-making machinery must be kept at the expense of the submission, discrimination and exploitation of most countries in the world, including Mexico, who had the misfortune of being "far from God and close to the United States."

I bring some paragraphs that I think appropriate from a text I wrote a while ago that I titled, "The ravages of the democratic mirage"

It remains valid that the problem is not how to re-channel the world order, because it would be like reproducing the same death spiral of decadent politics, but how to retire that ruling political class, and eliminate the true ruling class (located in the United States, England, France and Israel), and make them understand that there is only one world, and build new letters to replace that democratic mirage, or give real effect to the Democratic State ”, because it will not be that political class that immolates itself to resurrect a healthier and more vigorous world political system, but the voice and strength of the peoples, who must take into their hands the death of democratic and undemocratic dictators, the world system must emerge not from the ashes of this outdated world political system based in a geopolitics of forces and against forces to maintain a single play, where even the revolutionary act is worth measured and predictable as long as they are maintained have the 1% that holds true power.

We have as a point of reference to organize our life in society myths, mainly the democratic, from where men access political power, and from where they want to make it seem that it is for the welfare of the people, but it is not so, it is the stage that have allowed us to mount to choose the subjects that reproduce the dominant system, and maintain the perverse and immoral status quo.

We are facing a social reality that is not what our conceptual and knowledge frameworks describe, much less what Plato, Aristotle, Rousseau, Hobbes, Locke, Diderot, etc.- wrote, we are closer to Machiavelli, Dostoevsky, Nietzsche , Freud, Foucault, etc. We have to rewrite the history of man, and even when it hurts to stop loving each other, and see tragedy and the irrational as the constituent.

In counterpart, and the worst thing that has not come from an intellectual, nor from a revolutionary, nor from a humanist, but a subject of the same lineage, who makes an apology for the other part of the dilemma, "or we save man" Bill Gates: "Recovering the economy is more reversible than reviving people."

This does not sculpt him from being part of the construction of that pernicious democratic mirage and its fatal ravages, perhaps it may be that his statement is motivated by his recent experience of thinking about death, the reflections that come from that limit, the real, of the non-being, unfortunately they occur when it is too late, an experience that they always end up understanding that banal and frivolous life has no meaning in the face of loss of being, death is the only thing that completes us, and the meaning of life is it reduces the body, a body that does not want to abandon.

The coronavirus health emergency puts us before a dilemma that is not easy to resolve, any decision implies suffering, because the roads carry a truth, death, so we either preserve that monstrous and inhuman neoliberal economy with more deaths, or we preserve the man, even if I have to start from scratch, and this is not without death and suffering. A dilemma that should never have existed.

Some babbling of the new grammar of man:

It is necessary to deprive rational discourse of that privilege of absolute criterion of truth, and discover that endogenous and exogenous elements that self-reference coexist, mainly in social stages, making any discrimination and regeneration impossible, unless it occurs a dialectical qualitative leap from the negation of the negation that makes a new being possible, even though it is condemned sooner than later to alienate itself in that self-reference.

This is not so clear, unless the phantom Marxism of that self-deception is recognized, and the reduction to that economic plus of the human sense of true existence, and the privilege of the legitimizing discourse of that rationale to the death that adding to the Freudian unconscious cancels all singularity , singularity necessary to solve the problem of that unique vision of the face world that we live as real.

I say again, May our civilization rest in peace

[1] https://www.entornopolitico.com/columna/38078/lenin-torres-antonio/