About the Failed Mexico and the electoral process of 2018

He did not stop listening and reading that Mr. López was given a trap, or that the most benefit of the debate, despite his corruption scandal, had been the young Anaya, and perhaps his only virtue, his youth, and the stitch of "Mocha manos", and Mrs. Calderón's status as a woman, and perhaps her only advantage, and with that of the gender proportionality that the congress approved as her maximum expression of equality between men and women, would be her Madam President, and of the gray presence of Mr. Meade's "partisan citizen" candidate; and mainly, the positioning around the question of who won the debate?

The debate is not who won the debate, since it is more than seen the quality of the debate and the format made to order for the guerrilla war, with the short time that candidates had to present their ideas and proposals, which gave time only for the diatribe, the mentioned one of mother, or for the inconceivable occurrences in a debate that has as background a serious crisis of a country that falls in pieces in the matter of security, poverty, marginalization, among other serious evils. A debate that resembled a fierce fight of rabid dogs disputing the bone (public power). That is why I think that the debate is not about who won the debate, but about how to give continuity to a project of a nation with a decadent, blind, perverse and petty political class, and a society that is asleep, self-absorbed, or perhaps petrified by real fear. . So I do not hesitate to say that the debate was disgusting, moral and political disgust, so I could not take more than seeing some segments, which gave me enough elements to affirm the above.

I must confess that I expected to see a Mr. López full of arguments and counterarguments, proposals and intelligence, and that I would have liked him to spit in my face, to deny everything I've been writing and thinking about him, but the truth is that it confirmed my affirmation that "it does not have a national project, nor a new idea of ​​world and society" from which to make the new revolution of the XXI century Mexico, despite its evident defeat in the debate, I believe that the Mexican people It has another option, and its only option, because it wants it, is to choose within the bad, at least bad, within the mediocre, at least mediocre, within decadence, the least decline, although this does not guarantee that they will be resolved the serious problems he lives. And I say "because he wants it", because that revolution is in his hands "putting aside that decadent political class" that has closed the certainty of the future, and has living in fear, poverty and marginalization .

That is why it is good to return to some fragments that I have written, "the triumph of Mr. López will reveal to us the poor long-awaited transition to the" Great Politics "and the" True Democracy ", constituting the staging in the Mexican politics that has aspired to be modern and enlightened, a mediocre indirect electoral messianic democracy that will empower political and social power to the characters that make up the decadent political class, and the occasional post-revolutionary coffee (now virtual communities).

I am sure that "unfortunately for Mexico AMLO will not be the point of reference of the new political, social and economic model that Mexico needs to get out of the grave crisis of certainty of future, poverty and violence."

And that "that indirect messianic influence will be the main reference of political power that will question the quality of our democracy, and the high-mindedness of the political class blinded by the struggle fierce for narcissistic and transcendental economic power.

For what Mr. Lopez, "will be light years away from having headed the Fourth Social and Political Movement to replace the worn out and pernicious Revolutionary Left model at first, a neoliberal de-ideologized by the pragmatic and virtuality that dug its own tomb "," For more than 100 years that Revolutionary Model built the contradictory, poor, worn out, dangerous and without pride that small Mexicans live today.

The great tribunes will continue to be the great legislative majorities that will crush any discordant voice, and the political office will continue to be in the art of making lie and falsehood seem true.

The Suffering, Crouched, and Conforming People now jump everywhere to only pronounce AMLO, AMLO, AMLO, without the ability to realize that this policy will not save Mexico or the Mexicans from the era of void that is coming virulent and cruel.

I am going to affirm that it is not a dilemma, to vote or not to vote for AMLO where the social and political debate is located, it is in the exhaustion of politics, the serious crisis of the political parties without differentiation and the decadence of the political class where the social and political debate is currently located, and that debate is absent, because the policy that should be science, now it is humor and circumstances, is a simple Machiavellian strategy.

The diagnosis of the sick body of post-revolutionary Mexico is known to everyone for its direct impact on the quality of life of the Mexican, the simple fact of living with fear and not being able to walk quietly through our streets is enough to say that we live in a Failed State and that the Policy does not work. That's why fearful and faint-hearted many rush to see AMLO as the only option that is glimpsed because the vast majority of Mexicans know that the same decadent and corrupt political class ran out as a government option, and although Mr. López will not be able to never erase their origins, and hide the reasons for their break with the PRI, which was surely the dispute between the spaces of power and not by convictions and community ideals that both proclaim, is the only pragmatic option (and that pragmatism is dangerous) not the populism) that we have, this should not be understood that the option is mediocre meades or anayas, much less Mrs. Calderón, much less El Bronco, better known now as the "mocha manos", the problem is to make AMLO understand that it corresponds to him to be a part-waters in that transition towards the Great Policy and the New Political Class, that would imply a new Constituent, and the consensual and community search of a evo model of society and world that allows reconstructing the social bond eaten by a weak and failed state, reform the feeling of belonging that allows recovering the lost identity of mexicanidad, and fundamentally, that install the conscience to the Mexican people of the coresponsibility in the construction, preservation and updating of public spaces, the art of living one in front of another, what we call "community", thus forming a Community Republic. This implies educating the people that civic, social, moral and political responsibility does not end in suffrage.

There is no criticism of AMLO in the naive strategy of that part of the decadent political class to put into the collective unconscious the simile of a workshop with Chavism, because this is part of that filthy dirty war and the attempt not to lose power, and that they obey geopolitical interests to destabilize any discordant voice to the neoliberal empire that governs the world. They naively launch the results and the social crisis that Venezuela is experiencing as the counter-argument to scare the electorate, underestimating the Mexican people and considering it as a ball of ignorant people who will be frightened and terrified by the images in the mass media will not be able to think and analyze more carefully the Venezuelan case, and see that the crisis of the Brotherhood State of Venezuela is produced not by populism but by the interference of the Empire to silence the opposition voices to the macro interests of the 1% that really governs this world, and of course Mexico is not exempt from this.

Trump at the head of the empire does not like to think that Mr. Lopez comes to power, and will force his henchmen to act, that's why we see the launch of even series on YouTube about populism as the great evil of the century, and not the Empire alive and kicking like the great evil of the world.

Beware that Chavez criticism is decontextualized, better to see that Mr. Lopez, if it does not reach the heels of Francisco I Madero, or Hugo Chavez, at least it was a counterweight to the Empire, and supported a Bolivarian anti-imperialist ideological background that came to work in the fight against poverty, but the strength of the intervention with its internal minions (the cacique caste that governed Venezuela before Chavez), in sum, Obrador lacks ideology, is a poor voluntarist, who only picks up from diagnosis the causes (corruption) and naively thinks that solving corruption will solve the social, political, ethical, identity, psychological and philosophical crisis that Mexico is going through, in other words, as I said before, it does not have a model and idea of ​​man and society, and worse are the meades and anayas, garbage, bad copies of politicians and minions of the neoliberal Empire.

In the text that states Urgent Letter to AMLO and the Mexican Society, I pointed out that "it is a necessary and inescapable condition that whoever wins public power must not be an anti-democratic, sectarian and excluding, much less a messiah, and demonstrate that can govern for all, and fundamentally is able to sit at the table of governance to others, to rebuild the Mexican State and start a sincere process of National Reconciliation and Power Regeneration, promoting a New Political Culture. And that understands that the postponed Great Policy implies a linear history that feeds on the accumulation of enriching experiences, and not cyclical that ends with the substitution of the man of the power in turn.

Sizing what is at stake implies placing ourselves in the real, taking into account that we are facing the mourning of thousands of disappeared, the rescue of the marginalization of thousands of poor people every day on the rise, the recovery of the certainty of lost future of our young people and children, the demand of punishment to those who have made the culture of corruption that what little has been had stopped in the handbags of a few, the sincere forgiveness, if it can happen, of the oligarchy that He has taken the opportunity to continue protecting his small world of privileges at the expense of the pain and marginalization of millions of Mexicans, and we now see him joining Mr. López.

Unveiling the decadence of the "political class" as the determining factor of the social and political crisis that the Mexican State is experiencing, does not condition the possible emergence of a possible Civilizing Process of Democratic Transition and National Reconciliation, although this does involve the condition that that political class assumes full responsibility for that crisis without exceptions, because there are no valid justifications, we are stories and our history defines us, the transfuguism was and has been the door of rescue and moralization of many members of that political class, among them Andrés Manuel López Obrador, among many others, more now when the dominant power group collapses. So all by liabilities or assets are responsible for the crisis of the Mexican State and the cancellation of the future certainty of our future generations.

In addition, the de facto recognition of the state of emergency that our Nation lives, and the urgency of sitting down to speak on a plane of equality and sincerity to establish the political, legal, reformist, ethical, and epistemic conditions determined by the new framework, is unavoidable. conceptual and the relevant civilizatory processes that lead the Mexican State to its Regeneration.

So no simplistic and monothematic recipe (solve corruption) as promoted by Mr. Lopez, can face and give solution to the crisis that crosses our homeland. Today is the time of ALL. There are no private cumin, Creon emerges against all the selfish cries of Antigone.

A new Conceptual Framework and Civilizatory Processes sine qua non conditions so that the rule of law does not get between said and work, beginning with the total transparency of the coming electoral process, in addition a roadmap is necessary to guarantee compliance with said the civilizing process of democratic transition and national reconciliation and prevent the dialogue from being stopped due to the transformation of Mexico, and continue operating the pure exclusionary power that has done so much damage to Mexico. It is therefore up to the Mexican people to force that political class that refuses to regenerate to behave with decorum and ethics, if not, politics will be a failed instrument, the State will continue to be Failed, and I believe that History will also continue to be a concept failed

I am still waiting for the real policy in a time to come.